Friday, August 4, 2023

Unraveling the Complexities of Manipur's Identity Conflict

 (This blog has been created with comprehensive contributions from my friends belonging to the Maitei and Kuki communities in Manipur. They have offered detailed and impartial firsthand insights on the ground-level situation in Manipur. For obvious reasons, they have chosen to remain anonymous. My sincere gratitude to them for helping me understand the situation in Manipur and the reasons for the current situation.)

 

The circumstance in Manipur is perplexing, no doubt. It goes past the battle between identities. Strict faultlines have just intensified the circumstance despite the fact that it is a viewpoint either disregarded or specifically told as a "battle between Hindu Meiteis and tribals." Illegal infiltration is at the core of this issue. All things considered, there is a vile plot at play and history is observer to it. Misdirecting established press reports also have straightforwardly favored one side, obviously so. Notwithstanding how that might be, Northeast, sadly, keeps on enduring the worst part.

 

Viciousness broke out between generally Hindu Meiteis and Christian Kukis on third May during a Tribal Solidarity March' coordinated by the All Tribal Student Union Manipur (ATSUM) in the Churachandpur region's Torbung region to go against the interest of the Meeteis for Scheduled Tribe (ST) status.

 

While the ancestral gatherings have been restricting the Meitei people group's interest for ST status for a really long time, the new fights and violence were set off by a Manipur High Court request on 27 March, directing the Manipur government to submit suggestions to the association government for the consideration of Meitei in the ST list. The court had given the request after a few petitions documented by Meitei activists looking for the said bearing.

 

Meiteis have been looking for the ST status beginning around 1981 when the then CM Rishang Keishing brought the issue up in the state get together. In 1995, they were allowed the Backward Classes (OBC) status. Two sub-castes inside the Meiteis - Chakpas (recently known as lois) and Thoubal Khunous (earlier called Yaithibis) - were at that point distinguished as Scheduled Castes (SC) in 1956.

 

The Meiteis have made numerous solicitations by submitting updates to the state and the center beginning around 2013 in such manner yet without much of any result. In 2012, the Scheduled Tribe Demand Committee of Manipur (STDCM) was framed which presented the principal such notice in November 2012 to the then Governor Gurbachan Singh Jagat.

 

In December same year, one more notice was presented by the STDCM to the then Congress CM Okram Ibobi Singh.

 

On 29 May 2013, the Service of Ancestral Undertakings kept in touch with the Manipur govt looking for a particular suggestion on the consideration of Meiteis in the ST show; it likewise looked for the most recent socio-economic survey information and an ethnographic report on Meiteis. It has been 10 years yet no entries have been made by the state because of the Center’s letter. This in spite of 30 representations made to the state and 10 to the Central govt.

 

Why do the Meiteis want ST status? Who are they?

 

Meiteis, also known as Meetei or Manipuri, make up the majority of the state of Manipur's population (about 53%, according to figures from the 2011 census). The Pangals, who are Muslims and make up the majority of Meiteis, are Hindus. They are currently classified as OBCs.

 

It is interesting to note that the Meiteis were a "tribe among tribes of Manipur" when the Merger Agreement of Manipur into the Union of India was signed on September 21, 1949. After Manipur joined India, their ST status was removed. The Meiteis didn't protest when they were removed from the ST list since SC-ST status wasn't sought after at the time, the reserve wasn't that large, and even government positions weren't valued as highly as they are now.

 

Significantly, it is worth noting that Meiteis in Manipur, who constitute a majority of the population, are confined to a mere 2,000 sq km area within the shrinking Imphal valley. This area comprises East and West Imphal, Thoubal, Kakching, Bishnupur, and Jiribam. Despite the state's total area being 22,327 sq km, the Meitei community occupies only about 10% of the land and has no rights to acquire land beyond this limited region. Purchasing or occupying land in the tribal hill districts, which account for 90% of Manipur's land, is prohibited for non-tribals.

 

The World Meetei Council emphasizes that restoring the Scheduled Tribe (ST) status is crucial for the community's survival. The Meitei community faces economic challenges, with a significant number living in poverty. Among the indigenous communities in the Northeast, Meitei is one of the smallest, smaller than Naga, Khongjai (Kuki), Tai-ahom, and others. Historically isolated and disconnected from mainland India, the Meitei community now has a relatively small population of approximately 17 lakhs, with around 14 lakhs in India, 2 lakhs in Manipur, and the rest scattered across other northeastern states and cities in India. This dispersal leads to social and cultural discomfort. The community's per capita income is meager, at Rs 70,000/- only, and about 32.59% of the population lives below the poverty line. While the literacy rate is 79%, the lack of access to higher education due to economic challenges remains a concern.

 

In December 2019, responding to the concerns raised by the Meitei community, the Central government extended the Inner Line Permit (ILP) system to Manipur. This move was made to address the fears among the Meiteis about the potential loss of their land. The Inner Line Permit system regulates the entry of outsiders into certain regions, including Manipur, to protect the rights and interests of the local population, in this case, the Meiteis, and control the ownership and use of land within the state.

 

Who are the Kukis, and what are the reasons behind their opposition to conferring ST status on Meiteis?

 

The Kuki tribe in Manipur, primarily Christian, comprises over 20 sub-tribes and is also known as CHIKIM – Chin-Kuki-Mizo-Zomi – and CHIKUMI. Believed to have migrated from the Chin state of Myanmar, some settled in Bengal and came to be known as Kukis.

 

Another significant tribal group in Manipur consists of several Naga tribes, but they have chosen to remain distant from the current conflict. While opposing the granting of ST status to Meiteis, they have not participated in the ongoing protests and violence.

 

It is worth noting that Kukis are relatively new to Manipur, having migrated from Myanmar in the 18th and 19th centuries due to persecution by more powerful groups. This migration, known as the Great Kuki Exodus, brought a significant number of Kukis from the Mizo and Chill hills to Manipur.

 

The reasons for Kukis' migration to Bengal, Mizoram, and eventually Manipur were diverse. The Meitei kings, facing occasional raids by Nagas, settled Kuki tribes from Myanmar to act as demographic buffers, known as Old Kukis or Khongjais. Additionally, the British settled immigrant Kukis in the area for similar reasons.

 

Despite being incorporated into Manipur's population due to historical circumstances, Kukis were not necessarily original inhabitants of the region, unlike the Meiteis and Nagas. Ongoing migration from Myanmar, driven by the volatile situation and inter-group conflicts, has created tension, with Meiteis alleging that local Kukis aid Burmese Kukis in illegal immigration and settling on forest land.

 

Despite their differences, Kukis and Meiteis have coexisted in Manipur. However, Kukis argue that Meiteis no longer possess the characteristics of a tribe, suggesting that the introduction of Hinduism by the King around the 1730s led to the loss of their tribal identity.

 

According to prominent Kuki leader Wilson L Hangsing, Meiteis who can identify with their sub-tribes under the Meitei umbrella may demand ST status, but he sees the overall demand, including by Brahmins who are not indigenous, as propaganda. The Kuki leader contends that the caste identity of Brahmin Meiteis remains unchanged despite any loss of ethnic identity.

 

Kukis constitute 26% of Manipur's population and predominantly occupy 90% of the land, mainly in the southern hills, including Churachandpur, Kangpokpi, Chandel, and Tengnoupal districts. The northern region, comprising Senapati, Ukhrul, Tamenglong, and Chandel districts, is mainly occupied by the Naga tribe, accounting for 17% of the state's population. Historically, Nagas have had amicable ties with Meiteis, with some Nagas integrating into the Meitei population.

 

Regarding the current situation, Nagas have distanced themselves from the conflict, and both Nagas and Kukis have the right to purchase land in the Imphal Valley.

 

Since 1980, there have been demands for a separate 'Kukiland,' particularly after the emergence of Kuki-Zomi insurgent groups like the Kuki National Organisation (KNO), Kuki National Army (KNA), and Zomi Revolutionary Army (ZRA). Recently, Kukis have sought the establishment of a Kukiland Territorial Council, akin to the Bodoland Territorial Council in Assam.

 

Planned infiltration, encroachment, and the menace of drugs.

 

Initially, the conflict appears to revolve around issues of identity and the demand for ST status among the Meiteis. However, the situation is more complex than that. The state of Manipur faces significant challenges due to the influx of illegal migrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh, the emergence of illegal villages, poppy cultivation, and terrorism. These factors directly threaten the state's demography and resources, leading to a growing demand for the implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) among the Meitei community.

 

According to Meitei allegations, Kukis from Myanmar and Bangladesh have been crossing the border illegally, seizing land, and finding refuge with their distant relatives who moved to India decades ago. This has also facilitated the expansion of the drug trade.

 

The Kukis have been occupying large areas of forest land and converting them into poppy plantations, leading to a thriving opium trade. Alongside the poppy farms, illegal villages have been cropping up in the hill districts, particularly in the protected and reserved forest areas of CHIKUMI districts. Many of these encroachers are Burmese Kukis who have migrated illegally, with their numbers increasing since the coup in Myanmar in February 2021.

 

In response, the N. Biren Singh government has launched extensive crackdowns on encroachment and poppy cultivation since coming to power. Although security forces have been destroying poppy fields, they keep resurfacing.

 

Additionally, the government has taken action against several illegally built churches on lands under reserved and protected forests. Despite repeated notices from the government to the villages, there has been no compliance but rather open defiance. Both the Meiteis and the Nagas have strongly supported the state government's eviction efforts.

 

Some allege that the demand for ST status among the Meiteis was a pretext for violence, and the real motive behind the unrest is opposition to the crackdown on encroachment and poppy cultivation. Furthermore, it is suggested that the demolition of illegal churches might have also contributed to the tensions.

 

To address the issue of large-scale illegal poppy cultivation, the Manipur government launched a campaign against drugs in 2017. This illicit cultivation is mainly concentrated in the hill districts of Ukhrul, Senapati, Kangpokpi, Kamjong, Churachandpur, and Tengnoupal.

 

Data from 2017 to 2023 indicates that 2,518 arrests have been made. Interestingly, the highest number of arrests were among Muslims, followed by Kuki-Chin, Meitei, and others.

 

A total of 15,496 acres of poppy cultivation have been discovered. Among these, Kuki-Chin tribes recorded 13,121.8 acres, Nagas recorded 2,340 acres, and other communities accounted for 35 acres.

 

The crackdown is in response to the escalating issues of drug abuse and trafficking, particularly among the youth. The drug problem has even reached the political circles of Manipur.

 

Furthermore, the Meiteis have demanded the sealing of the India-Myanmar border due to the influx of "terrorist groups." The situation in Manipur remains intricate, requiring comprehensive efforts from the government and cooperation from various communities in the state to address the interrelated challenges.

 

Conflicts in Manipur

 

The Burmese occupation of Assam for seven years (1817-1826) had repercussions in neighboring Manipur, known as Chahi-Taret Khumtakpa, the seven years of devastation. In later years, clashes between Nagas and Kukis in 1992 and communal clashes between Pangals (Muslims) and Meiteis (Hindus) in 1993 resulted in significant fatalities. Notably, 3rd May has since been observed as a black day or Shaheedi Memorial Day by Pangals, who have their own armed groups, including All Manipur Muslim Students’ Organization (AMMSO), All Manipur Muslim Girl Students’ Organization (AMMGSO), and Pangal (Manipur Muslim) Political Forum (PPF).

 

The existence of the People’s United Liberation Front (PULF) is a less discussed factor, raising concerns about terrorism in Manipur, especially since 2006, when three Pangals were arrested with arms and ammo by the Delhi police. In 2018, the All Manipur Muslims Organisation Coordinating Committee (AMMOCOC) called for a bandh against the state's eviction drive, despite Chief Minister N Biren Singh's advice against communalizing the situation. There are concerns that a particular community in the state, under the guise of religion, is facilitating the entry of illegal migrants.

 

Experts studying the region, particularly Manipur, hold varying views. Some claim that Kukis are not the original natives but were settled in Manipur by the British from Myanmar after the Anglo-Manipur War in 1891. According to an unnamed expert, the Christian-convert Kukis have adopted a separatist-expansionist strategy, demanding a "Kukiland" that encompasses parts of Bangladesh, Burma, and India, leading to conflicts. There are also suggestions that the conflict might be orchestrated from outside India.

 

This situation presents a serious challenge for the Meiteis. The STDCM asserts that the Meiteis' population, which was 59% in 1951, has declined to 44% in 2011, indicating that they are no longer the majority. The trend suggests that this percentage might further decrease in the 2021 census, intensifying concerns for the Meitei community.

 

A letter from the Indigenous Tribal Leaders Forum (ITLF), a Kuki group, has garnered attention on social media and drawn criticism from non-tribals and experts. The letter openly admits to the distribution of lands and properties formerly owned by Meitei people, raising questions about any inaction by Indian forces, including the Assam Rifles, and declaring a "war for complete separation from the state of Manipur."

 

Anthropologist and Author, Rami Niranjan Desai, argues that the Kukis should not be accepting of illegal infiltrators based on historical or ancestral ties alone. She believes that a community accounting for 30% to 40% of the population cannot be considered a minority. The tribals in Manipur constitute around 47% of the population, which forms a crucial reason for Hindu Meiteis to demand a level-playing field. The complex dynamics in Manipur require careful consideration to address historical, communal, and demographic challenges effectively.

 

In Summary

 

The coverage of Manipur in mainstream media has shown significant bias. Most reports focus on the demand for ST status by the "Hindu majority Meiteis" without adequately explaining the context of their request. These reports extensively discuss tribal casualties, portray the crackdown on encroachments and poppy cultivation negatively, and oversimplify the conflict with a majority-minority perspective.

 

One highly underreported aspect of the ongoing conflict is the exodus of Hindus from the Kuki-majority Churachandpur district. Hindu activists claim that the violence on 3rd May was not a tribal vs. non-tribal issue, but rather initiated by Christian tribals aiming to displace Meiteis from Christian-dominated areas. Dr. Khangembam Romesh, an Assistant Professor in JNU, points out that Kukis spreading Christianity among Meiteis has had multiple negative impacts in the region, and churches are being used with a communal approach.

 

Hindu activists highlight the statement issued by the Tribal Churches Leaders' Forum in support of the tribal solidarity march organized by ATSUM. The forum unanimously endorsed the 'Solidary March' of ATSUM on May 1, stating that it aims to collectively protect the social, political, and religious interests of Manipur's tribal people.

 

The faultlines in Manipur cut across various aspects of identity. The available census data from 2011 may not be fully reflective of the current situation, as the world and Manipur have undergone manifold changes since then. The recent conflict sheds light on the evolving ground realities in Manipur. The demand for ST status by Meiteis and the vehement opposition from Kukis are technical details of the main underlying issues facing Manipur today.

 

Tracing the origins of these two communities may not yield immediate solutions to present-day challenges. However, it's essential to note that their ethnic identities also carry a layer of religious identity, contributing to the conflict. Without proactive measures and attention from the broader Indian community to "Look East" and "Act East," the situation may escalate beyond control.

Wednesday, May 10, 2023

The Bengal Story – An Open Letter to Mamata Banerjee

 Dear Chief Minister,

 

I write this open letter to you with deep disgust and a growing sense of outrage. It is with great concern that I observe the alarming trajectory of politics in West Bengal, particularly the disturbing trend of Muslim vote bank appeasement and the systematic discrimination against Hindus.

 

Your divisive and detrimental policies that have taken precedence over the well-being of West Bengal. Your Muslim Vote bank appeasement politics has firmly put a sensitive border state at high-security risk.

 

The utter and blatant hypocrisy practiced by you and your sycophants that compromise your party members will go down in history as an affliction point.


Here are a few uncomfortable questions for you and sycophants, which I am sure you and your minions will never dare to answer.

 

Question 1: Why did you ban the movie The Kerala Story?

 

Till a few days back you and your party sycophants were all crying and lamenting about the “fascist” behavior of the Central Govt. when the blatantly false agenda-driven documentary made by BBC, a propaganda machinery of a country which is directly responsible for the genocide of millions of Bengalis during their brutal 200 years occupation of India. You and your sycophants poured out millions of text and sound bites on Social Media lamenting how democracy has been subverted and freedom of speech has been curtailed by the Central Govt.

 

Yet you chose to ban the movie The Kerala Story, a movie that essentially exposes the operations of ISIS, an extreme terrorist organization promoting radical Islamic Jihad. An outfit that has been banned by every nation on earth and is universally acknowledged as the most dangerous terror outfit in the world.

 

The reason you provided to ban The Kerala Story is that it might hurt sentiments and provoke violence in West Bengal.

 

Question 2: Does that mean you are admitting that ISIS terrorists and radical Islamic Jihadi elements are there in West Bengal? 

Since logically only ISIS terrorists and radical Islamic Jihadi elements would be offended and take to violence as the movie The Kerala Story exposes them and how they are trapping and exploiting vulnerable women in India (and the entire world).

 

Question 3: How did ISIS terrorists and radical Islamic Jihadi elements come to find a base in West Bengal?

 

Question 4: Is that why you asked the Hindus in West Bengal not to enter “Muslim areas” with their processions during the recent Ram Navami and Hanuman Jayanti celebrations?

 

Question 5: Can you please define what is a “Muslim area” in West Bengal?

 

Question 6: Under what constitutional mandate have you defined “Muslim areas” in West Bengal?

 

I can see your party sycophants actively promoting something called “Gujarat Story”. A twisted narrative built by fake news peddlers. It is obvious your party sycophants won’t be promoting the “Gujarat Story” without your approval.

Question 7: So, can you please explain why you are promoting the fake agenda-driven “Gujarat Story of missing women” when you should be telling us about the “West Bengal Story of missing women”?


Question 8: Can you please tell us what happened to the 143102 missing women from West Bengal from 2016 to 2020?

 

YEAR

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

TOTAL

Missing Women from West Bengal – NCRB Data

24937

28133

31299

31299

27434

143102



And before you and your sycophants go ballistic and call these figures fake, let me assure you, these are figures your Govt. has reported to NCRB. And for good measure, I am attaching the NCRB reports on missing women from 2016 to 2020.

 

Question 9: So, tell us why 143102 women went missing under your watch from 2016 to 2020 in West Bengal?

 

Question 10: How many of these missing women from West Bengal have been recruited by ISIS and radical Islamic Jihadi elements?

 

Madam Chief Minister, I am compelled to draw a striking parallel between your leadership and the infamous Nero, the emperor of ancient Rome. Just as history recounts Nero's reign marked by self-indulgence, callousness, and a disregard for the welfare of his people, so too does your tenure evoke a similar sentiment of misplaced priorities and a focus on personal gain at the expense of the citizens you swore to serve. The echoes of Nero's fiddling while Rome burned to find resonance in your actions, as you have seemingly turned a blind eye to the concerns and suffering of the people of West Bengal while pursuing your own political agenda. It is a comparison that weighs heavily on the conscience of those who witness the consequences of your decisions on a daily basis.

 

Madam Chief Minister, I dare you and your sycophants to answer the above questions.



PS: As promised here are the NCRB reports







 

 

Sunday, April 30, 2023

Crisis in the Indian Judiciary?

There is this "Mangoman" who has been off late asking hard questions of the Indian Judiciary respectfully. He has been echoing what 140 Crore Indians have been feeling about the recent happening in the Indian Judiciary. Here is a link to some new questions he has posed to the President of India.

https://twitter.com/KailashGWagh/status/1652551702174912514?t=Wqs6vMHvyVYEjAELochv5A&s=08

Please do read it, because my blog is an extension to these questions posed by this "Mangoman".

-------

I think the Indian judiciary's crisis is coming to a rapid end.

And I must express my heartfelt gratitude to the current CJI for starting the fire that will finally consume the present Indian judicial system.

Given that I know some of you would be astonished by my assertion, allow me to quickly clarify.

I will use a hypothetical tale of a drunken bully to illustrate my argument. When does someone start to become a bully? Usually when the individual realizes that no one is present to confront him or her. The person is no longer accountable to anyone in the community as a result. This posture produces an addicting high. However, the high that comes from bullying become accustomed to by the brain and body over time. The bully turns to substance abuse to get an additional high.

At this stage, the bully starts to lose control because he/she believes he/she is omnipotent and omniscient and is under the influence of bodily intoxicants. The bully’s misbehavior gets worse and more repulsive to the community. The community is kept in terror of the bully in the hopes that there will be a chance to put an end to the problem. However, as with everything in life, things change. Eventually, the bully who is always drinking becomes so wasted that one day he/she sets his/her own home on fire. The residents in the community observe the fire but choose not to assist in putting it out. Bullying is destroyed by its own fire.

Now substitute a few words of the following terms in the hypothetical tale above:
1.       Activist judges
2.       Incestuous collegium
3.       Threat of Contempt of Court

Well, as we can see for ourselves, the fire has been lit. The people are fed up with the bullying. The House of Judiciary is burning. And there is no one who is willing to save it. We did not light this fire, and we will not go to their rescue. We will wait for the fire to consume this failed unaccountable institution. And then build something which is better and accountable to us.

Therefore, all we need to do is have patience.

Finally, there are the woke retards who believe they will emerge like a Phoenix from the ashes of this burning institution. The Phoenix is a pagan mythical creature, let me remind them. It is non-existent! And you really hate the pagans like us.

The core problem begins when people with a defined job to do, believe they are not accountable and begin behaving like woke-communist activists. And that my friends defines Judicial Activism.

Judicial Activism is an undemocratic form of decision-making, as judges are unelected officials who are not accountable to the public. By making decisions based on their own personal beliefs, rather than the will of the people or the legislature, judges act outside of their proper role.

Second, judicial activism can create legal uncertainty and unpredictability. If judges constantly interpret the law in new ways, it can be difficult for individuals and businesses to understand their legal rights and obligations.

Third, judicial activism can lead to a breakdown in the separation of powers, as the judiciary begins encroaching on the legislative and executive branches. This can undermine the proper functioning of democratic institutions and lead to an imbalance of power.

Finally, judicial activism is harmful to the legitimacy of the judiciary itself. When judges are seen as partisan actors who are pushing their own political agenda, rather than impartial arbiters of the law, it undermines the people’s faith in the judiciary as an institution.

And this is exactly what the 140 Crore people of India see today.

How do I see this ending? I am no seer, but logic dictates the following:

  1. The legal & judiciary community will fracture and go to war with itself. The majority of the people in the business of practicing law will see that their very relevance and survival are at stake. They will take on the tiny but extremely vocal woke-communist activists in their fraternity.
  2. The people of India will put extreme pressure on their elected representatives to make the judiciary accountable.

POSTSCRIPT: Perhaps our judiciary may like to note that there is only one Supreme Judge in this universe. We Sanatan Dharmic know this Judge as Shani Maharaj. And there is no hiding from this Supreme Judge.

And seriously, people who don’t know What is a woman? And What is a Man? … Can they be put into any position of power?

Tuesday, January 31, 2023

The Curious Case of Masochistic Hindus

I would like to start by asking everyone to spend a few moments watching this video post by Kailash Wagh (Twitter username @kailashwg). This will place this blog in context.


Assuming you have seen Kailash Wagh's video blog, I would want to elaborate on the substance and context of the vlog. 

The real history of India (not the fiction created by Marxist-Colonial-Nehruvian novelists) reveals one thing above all others. We have always been vanquished as a country by savage invaders, not because the invaders were superior to us, but because the invaders could simply bribe and buy away a few traitors who surrendered our nation's fate for a few gold pieces. These traitors were eventually dealt with harshly by the ones to whom they sold their souls.


This practice of a few selling their souls to our enemy for a few Ashrafis has not passed us by. There are a few people that continue this practice. Some do it openly as "Liberal" Hindus, while others do it discreetly as "Social Media Activist" Hindus. While the former is clearly detected, the latter, as Kailash Wagh so eloquently noted, likes to operate below the radar.

Some may argue that my comparison of these "liberal" and "social media activist" Hindus to Jaichands is harsh and exaggerated. However, I think that the truth, no matter how unpleasant, should not be sugarcoated. While most of the "liberal" Hindus label themselves as atheists, the "Social Media Activist" Hindus go around espousing the "cause" of Hindus.

Herein is the issue. Under the pretence of fighting for Hindu rights, "Social Media Activists" are actually attempting to uproot the very tree that has given Hindus a sense of pride and security. In his vlog, Kailash Wagh explains the reasons and motivations for this approach.

This begs the question, why are Hindus masochistic? Why do they get pleasure from flagellating their own people? This question has been bothering me for some years. I developed a notion after spending time with several of these "Social Media Activist" Hindus and many "Liberal" Hindus over the years. Perhaps social scientists should delve deeper into this.

I think this stems from 3 factors:
  1. Invariably I have seen that most of these "liberal" and "Social Media Activist" Hindus come from and have troubled and abusive family backgrounds and personal relationships.
  2. They have an extreme misplaced sense of self entitlement.
  3. And they are predatory in nature.
This has led me to believe that these folks are inherently morally bankrupt. Their unstable and abusive personal lives reveal themselves externally as aggression and duplicity. That is, they are far divorced from our Indic-Vedic traditions. And always, these people publicly or covertly attack people who adhere to our Vedic traditions and support conservative ideals.


While self-proclaimed "Liberal" Hindus are easily identifiable as the most illiberal people (if you disagree with their point of view). This new breed of "Social Media Activist" Hindus, in my opinion, is more dangerous and harmful to the cause of Hindus and Hindutva.

These "Social Media Activist" Hindus live among us and pose as one of us. They are loud and may be found on social media "questioning" the "plight" of Hindus in India. They will focus on unimportant and small issues while spreading anti-BJP and anti-Modi sentiments. This is done, of course, under the pretence of "questioning" the incumbent central authority. Every time an Abdul commits a crime against a Hindu victim, they would cry copious tears and breast-beat the sad status of Hindius in India. They would also "wonder" why Narendra Modi continues receiving awards from Arab (Muslim) nations. Insinuating subtly that Modi is an Islamic stooge.

While Kailash Wagh's Vlog has pierced and exposed these "Social Media Activist" Hindus. One point I would want to emphasise and build on in next few blogs is the agenda of the Multi-National Tukde-Tukde Gang. Some of you may be familiar with the Soros Gang. George Soros and his immedaite associates have publicly stated their desire to dethrone Modi in the upcoming Indian general elections in 2024.

When I refer to the Soros Gang, I am referring to a much bigger group of people who do not want Modi to return as Prime Minister in 2024. They are not opposed to a BJP-led government without Narendra Modi as Prime Minister. However, their ideal scenario would be a Khichdi coalition government comprised of Mamata-Kejriwal-Pawar-Miano. Remember the "good old days" of VP Singh-Gujral-Deva Gowda-Chandra Shekhar?

The Soros Gang is a moniker used to describe a group of global elite that includes the largest military industrial complex, bio-pharma businesses, big-tech enterprises, and of course global wokesters. George Soros is only a modest but vital gear in the vast worldwide mafia wheel. This is essentially a cabal of white people clinging to their privileged power. One thing this cabal despises is Narendra Modi. He is an antithesis to all of their goals.

The Gazwa-E-Hind paltan is the next anti-Modi brigade. Here we have a one-of-a-kind short-term mingling of Christian soul-harvesters with typical Jihadi Radical Islamists. For reasons I won't go into, both of these factions are bitter adversaries yet have banded together to depose their common foe, Modi. Moditva has gravely harmed them during the previous nine years. Moditva is an indirect mechanism mastered by the present dispensation of reducing the Gazwa-E-Hind paltan's money supply. Which has affected their ability to work in India.

Last but the least is are the Mao rats (who like to name themselves wolf warriors). Essentially these are the Chinese Communist Party imperialists who fancy themselves as the next great Ching dynasty. Decicively Moditva has beaten the Mao rats in the last few years in both direct and indirect confrontations. The Mao rats always had their resident Indian stooges, who have been consigned to the Kaachre Ka Dabba by Moditva. And most of the "Liberal" Hindus, who so much love the idea of a Marxist utopia are ardent follower of the little red book.

These 3½ disparate and contradictory cabals have banded together with a single goal in mind: to dethrone Modi in the 2024 Indian General Election. And it appears that they've all found a willing instrument in the form of "Social Media Activist" Hindus. For a few ashrafis and their unmet feeling of entitlement, these "Social Media Activist" Hindus have launched a campaign to sow doubts in the minds of middle-class Hindus with their Hindus in Danger and Modi is liked by Arab Islamist campaigns.


Here's a tiny dose of reality for the entire anti-Modi mob. 2024 will not be a repeat of 2004. The 2020 strategy will not work in India. We know who you are, and we will pursue you with similar zeal. For 20,000 years, Sanatan Dharmis have lived and prospered. And we will not go extinct. So I advise the anti-Modi group to keep their knickers tight. We're on our way to get you right now.






Post Script: In my next blog I will dewell at large on the Soros gang and at one Ms Newland in particular. She seems have shifted her gaze from Putin to Modi. And this is likely to make some people reading my rambling very very uncomfortable. 

Monday, June 15, 2015

The Curious Case of Muhammad Yunus's son Adil Shahryar

Most people would know about the relations between Muhammad Yunus & the Nehru-Gandhi Dynasty. Mr. Yunus had a checkered history with the Nehru-Gandhi family. Some (or maybe most) believe Mr. Yunus had a very very special relationship with Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Mr. Yunus was a career diplomat (IFS). Post his retirement he was made special secretary to Indira Gandhi.

But this Blog is not about Mr. Yunus and Mrs. Gandhi rumored special relations, but rather about his son Mr. Adil Shahryar. A little Googling would reveal how special and friendly Mr. Adil Shahryar was with the Rajiv Gandhi and his family.

Why is Mr. Adil Shahryar special? Well it seems that this friend of Rajiv & Sonia Gandhi was a convicted criminal in the USA. He was given a prison term of 35-years for his crimes in the USA. It seems Mr. Adil Shahryar was involved in importing banned items to the USA and a few million dollar insurance frauds and a host of other charges and was promptly caught and put away for 35-years.

Now the interesting part, it seem Mr. Adil Shahryar got a presidential pardon from then US president Ronald Reagan on June 11, 1985.

It just so happens that the Butcher of Bhopal Gas Tragedy, Mr. Warren Anderson was allowed to escape from India on December 7, 1984. Mr. Warren Anderson's escape from India was personally supervised by then PM Rajiv Gandhi & Madhya Pradesh CM Arjun Singh. In fact Mr. Anderson was escorted by MP Govt. officials to the Bhopal airport tarmac and given a "grand" send off.

Now skeptics and Nehru-Gandhi Dynasty boot-lickers will phooh-phooh all I have stated so far. Probably label me as a Sanghi (LOL). But here are the interesting questions:

  1. Why did Ronald Reagan suddenly pardon Adil Shahryar exactly 6-months after Warren Anderson was "pardoned" by Rajiv Gandhi?
  2. Why did Rajiv Gandhi "request" the Indian embassy in USA to "help" Adil Shahryar's return to India "in the most conducive manner".
  3. Was it necessary to send a chartered flight to get back Adil Shahryar to India?
  4. Why did Rajiv Gandhi have to clarify to India Abroad (see NY times report) about his relationship with Adil Shahryar?
  5. Why did Rajiv Gandhi have to issue a character certificate to Adil Shahryar declaring him innocent to India Abroad (see NY times report)?
  6. Why was Adil Shahryar put into cold storage once he was back in India?
  7. Why were the Indian Press "gently advised against" harassing a "private citizen" by the big bad old USA?

So if there was no quid-pro-quo on Anderson v/s Adil, why was this case buried in a hurry by the US justice department and the Indian Government.

Fact of the matter is that Rajiv Gandhi cut a deal with US Govt. and released Warren Anderson for Adil Shahryar.

Fact of the matter is that Rajiv Gandhi allowed a Mass Murderer like Warren Anderson get away.

Fact of the matter is that the US Justice Department rejected pleas of Hollywood actor Charlton Heston (a family friend of Mr. Yunus & Nehru-Gandhi's) for clemency to Adil Shahryar. Yes even the famous Mr. Heston (nee Mr. Benhur, Mr. 10 Commandants, etc.) was roped in to campaign for Adil.

Fact is at some point of time Ronald Reagan and the US Justice Department had a sudden change of heart and decided to release Adil Shahryar on "humanitarian grounds".

Attachements

NY times Report








































Adil Shahryar: Paperwork as in US archives before Presidentrial Clemency by Ronald Regan
DOWNLOADS


Detailed Report on Toxic Watch

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Why CONgiTards are Petrified with Yoga? Remember Dhirendra Brahmachari?

I was trying to figure out why CONgiTards are so petrified of Yoga. Then I remembered an old story published in the Illustrated Weekly of India.


Once upon a time in India, there was a magazine called the Illustrated Weekly of India. And there was a chap who did an interesting article on one of the most powerful Nehru-Gandhi family Agents / Dalal ever. One Shri Dhirendra Brahmachari.

Here is the reproduction of the article published in the Illustrated Weekly of India, written by Pritish Nandy, published in the June'1986 issue.

(Scanned in 2-page magazine format, scroll right & down to read complete feature)






Who Really Owns NDTV? (Image files from moneylife.com)